The U.S.-Canada trade war is spilling over—literally. In response to Trump’s 25% tariffs on Canadian goods, several Canadian provinces, including Ontario, have removed U.S.-made alcohol from store shelves. The Liquor Control Board of Ontario (LCBO), one of the world’s largest alcohol buyers, has banned the sale of American beer, wine, and spirits.
Jack Daniel’s parent company, Brown-Forman, is feeling the impact. CEO Lawson Whiting called the ban “worse than a tariff,” as it completely eliminates U.S. alcohol sales in affected provinces. However, with Canada accounting for just 1% of Brown-Forman’s global sales, the firm can absorb the hit.
The retaliation follows Canada’s own 25% tariffs on U.S. alcohol, but some provinces have taken matters further by enforcing outright bans. Ontario Premier Doug Ford says the LCBO sells nearly $1 billion worth of U.S. alcohol annually, making the ban a significant statement in the ongoing trade dispute.
For economics students, this case is a perfect example of protectionism, trade retaliation, and market intervention. While tariffs aim to correct trade imbalances, an outright ban shifts consumer preferences entirely, favoring domestic industries. But does this escalate tensions further rather than resolve them?
THINK LIKE AN ECONOMIST!
Q1. Define the term “protectionism”.
Q2. Explain using a demand and supply diagram how banning U.S. alcohol in Canada will impact Canadian alcohol producers.
Q3. Evaluate whether trade restrictions like tariffs and import bans are effective strategies for protecting domestic industries.
Click here for the source article
